Crypto gambling sites like Roobet: what the cashiers take

Ten of Roobet's eleven are ordinary in this market. Bitcoin appears in all twenty-two cashiers on file and Ethereum in twenty-one — the single cashier missing Ethereum is KatsuBet's, which lists Bitcoin and nothing else. Litecoin, at seventeen, is more widely carried than either dollar stablecoin.

The eleventh is the exception and the most useful line in the table. SUI appears in no other cashier we have read. Whatever else a move from Roobet costs, it costs that deposit route: of the twenty-two alternative cashiers on file, none lists it, and no alternative in this set can therefore reproduce Roobet's eleven in full.

Below the top four the coins split into two roughly equal camps. DOGE at thirteen, XRP and TRX at twelve, and USDC, SOL and BNB at eleven each are on about half the cashiers — common enough to find, not common enough to assume.

Turning the count around gives the number that matters to somebody actually moving: how many of Roobet's eleven a given alternative would still accept. The best in the set reach ten, and all of them are missing the same coin.

Two of those results are worth reading twice. LTC Casino's cashier has ten coins in it and all ten are Roobet's — a complete subset with nothing added. Rainbet's has nine, and all nine are Roobet's. A short cashier is not necessarily a mismatched one, and a long one is not necessarily a match: Cloudbet lists forty coins, the deepest cashier in the set by a distance, and still reaches only nine of Roobet's eleven, because it prints TRON where Roobet prints TRX and does not carry SUI at all.

At the bottom, three cashiers would take three or fewer of Roobet's coins. Bspin lists BTC, ETH and USDT; Playbet.io lists BTC, SOL and ETH; KatsuBet lists BTC. Those are not thin records — they are short cashiers, published as short cashiers, which is a different and much more useful thing to know.

Nineteen of the twenty-two cashiers on file carry at least one dollar-pegged token. Eighteen list USDT under that exact ticker, and Rocketpot lists two chain-specific USDT entries rather than one generic one, which brings the count of cashiers taking a tethered dollar in some form to nineteen. USDC is on eleven, DAI on four.

Three cashiers on file carry no dollar token at all: Playbet.io, KatsuBet and Bitdreams. For anybody whose reason for using crypto at a casino is to avoid holding a volatile balance between deposit and withdrawal, that is the single most consequential line in their records, and it is the sort of thing a coin count of five or three does not communicate on its own.

Cloudbet is the only cashier reaching past the two mainstream dollar tokens, listing USDP, USDe and sUSDe alongside gold-backed PAXG and staked ETH. Those are the only appearances of any of them anywhere in this data, and they are a fair indication of how unusual its cashier is rather than of any trend.

The most common practical failure at a crypto cashier is not an unsupported coin; it is a supported coin sent over a network the operator does not credit. Nothing in this library resolves that. Every record here holds tickers, because tickers are what the cashiers print, and a ticker like USDT exists on several chains at once with different fees and different addresses on each.

Exactly one operator in the set publishes the distinction in its coin list. Rocketpot prints USDTE and USDTT as separate entries rather than a single USDT, which is the only place in this data where the network appears at all. Every other cashier prints one ticker and settles the network question somewhere inside the deposit flow, where it cannot be read in advance.

The chain-native assets in these cashiers give a rough sense of which networks are in play — TRX on twelve cashiers, BNB and SOL on eleven each, TON on four — but that is an inference from tickers, not a statement any operator has made. Before a first deposit the network is worth confirming on the deposit screen itself, and no comparison table, this one included, is a substitute for that.

Forty-nine distinct tickers appear across the twenty-two cashiers. Twenty-six of them appear on exactly one, and nineteen of those twenty-six are Cloudbet's alone — its meme assets, its staked and gold-backed tokens, and a handful of older chains nobody else lists. Strip Cloudbet out and the market's cashiers converge sharply.

Three operators list a token of their own: Shuffle lists SHFL, Sportbet.one lists SBET and TrustDice lists TXT. An operator token is an asset issued by the party on the other side of the bet, which is a different proposition from depositing in an asset it does not control, and none of the three publishes anything about that token in the documents read for this library.

The privacy assets stay marginal. XMR is on two cashiers, DuckDice's and Rakebit's. ZEC is on two, Rakebit's and Cloudbet's. DASH is on two, DuckDice's and Cloudbet's. Three brands account for all six appearances, which is the clearest signal in this data of how little of this market wants to handle an asset it cannot trace.

Going the other way, the two most widely listed coins Roobet does not take are BCH on ten cashiers and ADA on nine. Neither is a reason to move, but both are a reminder that Roobet's eleven is a mainstream selection rather than a wide one.

Two charges appear in Roobet's terms with clause numbers attached, and both are written against fiat rather than crypto. Clause 9.7 applies a 1% fee to all successful fiat deposits. Clause 10.8 applies a 2% fee from the tenth fiat withdrawal in any rolling thirty-day period and to each one after it within that window.

As written, neither clause attaches to a crypto deposit or a crypto withdrawal. That is not the same as a published statement that crypto movements are free of charge: nothing read for this library states a charge on a crypto movement, and nothing states there is none. What the terms do state separately, at clause 10.1, is that a deposit must be wagered before it can be withdrawn, and that clause is not written against any particular funding method.

None of the forty-one other sites like Roobet has a comparable crypto fee schedule on record in this library. Where an operator publishes network or processing charges, they were not in the documents read, so the honest position is that this comparison covers which coins each cashier takes and not what it costs to move them.